← Back to Library

Saturn’s children

A Summer Camp Lord of the Flies, Filtered Through a Novelist's Wit

Hal Johnson's "Saturn's Children" is a short story that reads like a fever dream stitched from the raw materials of childhood: summer camp, petty hierarchies, inflatable rafts weaponized as shields, and the terrifying moment when the kids realize they have overthrown the adults. The narrator, a twelve-year-old boy called Jay, recounts "one of the seminal events of the last twenty or thirty years" with a voice that oscillates between grandiose self-importance and genuine bewilderment at the chaos he helped create.

The setup is deceptively simple. Camp Calicut is run by a mustachioed philosopher-doctor named Mr. Kearn and a staff of interchangeable counselors "nearly faceless, nearly identical, indeterminate even as to age and gender." Johnson wastes no time signaling that this world operates by dream logic rather than realism. The counselors all share the name Harry and possess identical silver hair. The narrator himself confesses his memory may be unreliable, recalling his mother as having three breasts.

Saturn’s children

The Architecture of Rebellion

What distinguishes this piece from a straightforward Lord of the Flies retread is Johnson's refusal to play the allegory straight. The rebellion is led by Alan, a bug-eyed ringleader whose charisma is real but whose judgment is catastrophic. His army is three hundred children aged five to fourteen, and the narrator describes their appearance with unsettling precision: "The youngest ones had their tongues hanging out and were panting like dogs." Alan enters the scene "bedecked in a faux zebra-skin afghan and markered-up chef's hat," a would-be Caesar dressed in arts-and-crafts regalia.

The story's central tension is not really about the uprising itself but about the fragility of the social order that replaces it. Alan wins, takes control, but immediately begins losing his grip. When he performs what he considers "real satire" for his child army and receives only tepid applause, he erupts: "How dare you laugh at a juvenile poop song and boo real satire, you illiterate savages?" It is a perfect encapsulation of every revolutionary who discovers that overthrowing a regime is considerably easier than governing one.

Sentences That Earn Their Keep

Johnson is a prose stylist of uncommon range. He can be wickedly funny, as when describing Jay's attempt to conceal an inconvenient physiological response after hugging Ellen: "I was too busy trying to conceal from her my erection to care. This is why you don't hug girls like that at my age." The humor is twelve-year-old honest, delivered without apology or winking commentary.

But the same voice can pivot to something more layered within a single paragraph. When Jay flees alone through the camp's underground tunnels, Johnson conjures genuine dread from nothing more than dust, leaky batteries, and solitude. Jay finds a box of batteries in a fire-extinguisher niche and tests a nine-volt against his tongue: "Alan had told me if you ever did that you'd die, but Alan was a fucking liar." The line works as physical comedy, as characterization, and as a quiet declaration of independence from Alan's authority, all at once.

The prose is also dense with literary allusion worn lightly enough that readers who miss the references lose nothing. The narrator compares his grandfather's Normandy stories to his own camp narrative, invokes Clio the muse of history, and describes Alan's downfall in terms borrowed from the fall of Rome: "ochlocracy swept westward like the Huns." These are not pretensions; they are the natural idiom of a narrator who reads too much and understands too little.

Where the Dream Logic Frays

There are moments where the story's commitment to surrealism works against its emotional stakes. The transition from camp rebellion to airport wandering to frozen lake crossing happens at a pace that can feel more disorienting than dreamlike. Jay stumbles into an airport terminal where uniformed staff in red ask him about a 7:45 flight, and the scene has the quality of a Kafka parable grafted onto a coming-of-age story. Some readers will find this exhilarating; others may wish for a few more handholds.

The doppelganger who looks exactly like Ellen, glimpsed for a single sentence and then abandoned, is either a haunting narrative detail or a loose thread, depending on one's tolerance for ambiguity. Johnson is clearly aware of this, having the narrator say "who that doppelganger was I'll never know," but awareness of a story's unresolved elements is not quite the same as resolving them.

The Children's Republic and Its Discontents

The story's finest passage may be its depiction of Alan's short-lived kingdom. When Jay and Ellen return to camp expecting to face punishment, they instead find a totem pole recarved to bear Alan's likeness and a child "nearly naked, with his hands tightly gripping the wings of a raven above him," staggering under the weight of a twenty-foot pole balanced on his head. The image is grotesque and pitiful and somehow also funny, which is Johnson's preferred register throughout.

Alan's greeting to the returned deserters captures the absurdity of child tyranny perfectly. "Welcome to my kingdom," he says, "without a trace of irony." The narrator knows that "Hello, Alan" would lack "sufficient gravity" but also that the truthful response would be equally inadequate. This is the bind of living under any authoritarian regime: the available responses are all wrong.

The cave scene that follows, with its magazine-fed fire, its five-year-olds with "night vision" nipping at each other's necks, and its second graders serving soda to whoever bullies them, is Johnson's most savage commentary on power. Jay watches it unfold and thinks: "for this you turned the doorknobs, Alan? So they could become slaves and wild dogs?" The revolution has produced nothing but a crueler version of the hierarchy it replaced.

Bottom Line

Hal Johnson has written a story that is simultaneously a children's adventure, a political allegory, and a prose performance piece. It is not for every reader. The narrative voice is relentlessly digressive, the plot runs on dream logic, and the ending offers not resolution but a whispered admission that "it was already over." What makes it worth the disorientation is the quality of the sentences and the accuracy of the emotional register. Johnson knows exactly what it feels like to be twelve and swept up in events far beyond your comprehension, to mistake chaos for revolution and revolution for meaning. The story earns its title: these are Saturn's children, devouring and being devoured, and Johnson never pretends the spectacle is anything other than beautiful and terrible at once.

Deep Dives

Explore these related deep dives:

Sources

Saturn’s children

by Hal Johnson · · Read full article

(If you like this story, please check out my books, such as this collection of alternate history scenarios, this postmodern dirty-joke novel, or this straightforward suspense thriller,)

Any account I could give would be more notable for the incompetence of its narrator than for any fresh insight it might cast on the already over-documented events of that Thursday. Yet that I was present at what has proved to be one of the seminal events of the last twenty or thirty years may permit me to go on self-indulgently and at some length about my experiences. My grandfather, who churned the sand beneath his feet one June morning at Normandy has exercised a similar privilege in his day, and I can do no less than to follow in his example. And perhaps apologize to the future for being there at its conception, which is no less than our parents owe to us, and theirs to them.

It was an East Coast summer camp with a name that was, at the very least, well-intentioned. I suppose the whole camp was well-intentioned, the product of progressive thinking and intensive library research. If this were a longer or more ambitious narrative I would take pains to portray and individuate each member of its staff…but I would then be misrepresenting events. They were, in fact, nearly faceless, nearly identical, indeterminate even as to age and gender. They all had long silver hair, and were all, even the girls, named Harry. Their leader was an older man with a mustache, a doctor of philosophy and of medicine, named Mr. Kearn. He was a shadowy figure, they were all shadowy figures, speaking mainly to our parents and the press. In fact, there might have been only one Harry, multiplied in my youthful imagination (like the number of breasts my mother had; God help me I remember three).

There was, of course, a typical camp hierarchy, or at least a hierarchy I have taken for typical. There were counselors, who taught crafts and sent you to bed. The younger kids, K through third grade, had teachers, and spent all day in classrooms. There may have been several other hierarchical tiers I have elected to omit here. The camp had an ideology of some sort, but I have forgotten it, or they had: It wasn’t exactly emblazoned on the gates. I assume the camp had a schedule too, but ...