← Back to Library

This awards-nominated novel is pretty good

Naomi Kanakia delivers a rare and vital critique of modern capitalism by reviewing a self-published novel that treats human beings as tradable assets, arguing that the most terrifying dystopia isn't one of overt tyranny, but of banal, bureaucratic efficiency. While many science fiction stories focus on heroes fighting clear villains, Kanakia highlights how Drive A succeeds by showing a world where everyone is just "doing their job" while the system slowly consumes their humanity. This is essential reading for anyone trying to understand the trajectory of algorithmic management and the commodification of personal identity.

The Mechanics of Human Commodification

Kanakia zeroes in on the novel's central premise: a near-future America where unemployment is the norm and those who work must sell shares of their own future earnings to survive. She writes, "AI had clear-cut a lot of creative and process-oriented jobs, and was a blackpill rug-pull for those who felt like they'd been built for one thing." This observation cuts to the heart of current anxieties about automation, moving beyond the fear of job loss to the deeper terror of obsolescence. The book posits that in this economy, competition is so vicious that people must become their own startups, a concept Kanakia notes is used to facilitate corruption in ways that feel chillingly plausible.

This awards-nominated novel is pretty good

The author illustrates this with a specific example of how the system enables bribery: "Fulfilling these 'wishes' then became a way of racking up points for a later on-chain, off-balance-sheet transaction or OCOBST." Kanakia points out that this financialization of human potential creates a world where even the most intimate aspects of life are subject to market forces. She describes how firms securitize productivity gains, turning cognitive performance into "cognitive-backed securities" that can be sold to investors. This isn't just speculative fiction; it is a logical extension of the current trend where personal data and attention are already monetized. The novel's willingness to dive into the jargon of these trades makes the horror feel grounded rather than fantastical.

In this world, even freedom of thought is a privilege afforded only to the rich.

The Banality of the System

What makes Kanakia's review particularly compelling is her focus on the protagonist, Cable Rostenfarm, who represents a "classic meritocrat" trapped in a broken system. She argues that the book's power lies in the fact that the characters are not cartoonish villains. "They control this system, but they also somehow feel like they're at the system's mercy," she writes. This distinction is crucial. The characters are not driven by malice but by the mundane necessity of survival and career advancement. Kanakia notes that the story feels authentic because the characters are familiar with the idea that the system is corrupt, yet they persist in believing they can use it for good.

This framing challenges the reader to consider how easily they might rationalize participation in such a system. The novel depicts a society where resistance seems impossible, and the law has become "increasingly powerless." Kanakia observes, "The people in this story are not haunted by existential angst over what they're doing. But they are also not necessarily true believers." This lack of existential crisis is perhaps the most disturbing element of the narrative. It suggests that the ultimate victory of a dystopian system is not the suffering it causes, but the normalization of that suffering to the point where it no longer registers as abnormal.

Critics might note that the novel's reliance on financial jargon and complex trading strategies could alienate readers who prefer character-driven narratives over world-building exposition. However, Kanakia defends this choice by comparing the book to the "New Wave science fiction" of the past, which prioritized the extrapolation of current trends over traditional adventure plots. She argues that the book's "aggressive enthusiasm for the details of its science-fictional premise" is its greatest strength, even if it makes the pacing feel slow at times.

The Cost of a Safety Net

The review also touches on the personal stakes for the protagonist, whose family relies entirely on his success in this brutal market. Kanakia highlights a scene where the protagonist's father is manipulated by targeted advertising, illustrating how the system colonizes even the most basic human thoughts. "Their student housing has a kitchenette now," the father says, only to be corrected by his son who explains, "That's what they say, but I've wanted to get her those for a while. 'Cause the ads keep targeting them as key thoughts." This moment underscores the novel's central tragedy: the erosion of autonomy.

Kanakia writes, "Unlike his privileged coworkers, Cable has no safety net. His dad is an auto-mechanic who's about to be put out of work by AI. His sister is a PhD candidate whose future is also probably fairly bleak." This lack of a safety net drives the narrative tension, making the protagonist's success a matter of life and death for his family. The review suggests that the novel's true horror is not the high-concept financial instruments, but the way they amplify existing inequalities and strip individuals of their agency. The book serves as a warning about a future where human worth is determined solely by market value.

Bottom Line

Kanakia's review of Drive A is a masterclass in identifying the cultural significance of a niche, self-published work. Her strongest argument is that the novel's refusal to provide a clear villain or a heroic resolution makes it a more accurate and terrifying reflection of our current trajectory. The biggest vulnerability of the book, as Kanakia admits, is its dense pacing and reliance on financial jargon, which may limit its appeal to a broader audience. However, for readers willing to engage with its complex ideas, the novel offers a profound and unsettling look at the future of human capital.

Sources

This awards-nominated novel is pretty good

by Naomi Kanakia · · Read full article

For the last week I’ve been reading a self-published novel, Drive A, that the author submitted to a contest I’m running. This book is pretty good! I enjoyed reading it, and with this post I’m announcing Merritt Graves’s Drive A as a finalist for the Samuel Richardson Award.

This novel takes place in a near-future world where most (80%?) of the people in America are unemployed drones who subsist on a Universal Basic Income from the government and spend their time immersed in games, livestreams, and other virtual entertainments. In this world, if you have a job of any sort, you’re one of the lucky ones.

NPC (or non-player character) was increasingly becoming the term for people who didn’t work, collected basic income from the Fed, and spent most of their time in VR and watching other people’s livefeeds. AI had clear-cut a lot of creative and process-oriented jobs, and was a blackpill rug-pull for those who felt like they’d been built for one thing, spending their entire lives perfecting a craft that now—surprise, poof—wasn’t viable anymore. Most alarming, it wasn’t for any lack of effort to keep them as PCs: there were all kinds of work, volunteering, and re-training programs shuffling around various automation casualties.

But competition is vicious, and you’re always in danger of losing your foothold.

To gain an edge, some people do an initial public offering, selling off shares in themselves—these shares increase in value as their subject gains income and/or clout. This not only generates capital that they can use to invest in their education, it also gives them a set of powerful ‘shareholders’ who have a vested interest in their success.

Cable Rostenfarm IPO’ed at age twelve, used that money to go to a private school, and there developed an alliance with the powerful Chandley family. Now he’s graduated from college and working in his first job, at a human-cap firm—a hedge fund that invests primarily in individual peoples’ stocks.

What’s great about this book is the degree to which it’s fully invested in this premise. The book takes an absolute delight in the details of how people would hold, sell, and short various stocks, and the sorts of complex relationships that would form between people and their shareholders.

For instance, here’s an aside about how this system is used to facilitate the bribery of government officials:

[I had heard] more and more about ...