← Back to Library

Canada is building a surveillance network in space

The Walrus · · ·14 min read
Commentary by Hex Index staff

Wesley Wark doesn't just report on a telescope; he reveals a silent, high-stakes arms race happening in the vacuum above our heads. The piece's most startling claim is that the world's most valuable real estate is no longer on the ground, but in a chaotic, unregulated orbital layer where a single collision could trigger a cascade of destruction. This isn't science fiction; it is the immediate reality of a crowded sky where Canada is quietly building a sovereign shield.

The Iron Giant Awakens

Wark anchors his narrative in the Algonquin Provincial Park, resurrecting a dormant 46-meter radio telescope as the centerpiece of a new global surveillance network. He writes, "Our iron giant is a deep space radio telescope, with an antenna dish measuring forty-six metres across, the largest instrument of its kind in Canada." This revival is not for listening to aliens, as it was in the 1970s, but for a far more terrestrial and urgent purpose: tracking the debris and hostile maneuvers of modern spacefaring nations. The author effectively uses the metaphor of the "iron giant" to contrast the peaceful scientific aspirations of the Cold War era with the militarized pragmatism of today.

Canada is building a surveillance network in space

The stakes have shifted dramatically since the observatory was mothballed in 1987. Back then, the heavens were a binary contest between the US and the Soviet Union. Today, as Wark notes, "The ranks have since swelled to ninety-one" spacefaring nations, with the private sector launching thousands of satellites. He highlights the sheer scale of this congestion: "Starlink alone has launched an estimated 9,357 satellites... It has plans for as many as 42,000." This exponential growth creates a dangerous environment where "there is no binding international law requiring operators to disclose the location of their spacecraft."

The planet's most valuable real estate no longer sits on the ground but moves above the atmosphere—an orbital economy that must be protected.

The argument here is compelling because it reframes space not as a frontier for exploration, but as a critical infrastructure layer that underpins the global economy. Wark points out that losing these systems would cost the Canadian economy "about a billion dollars of gross domestic product per day." However, critics might note that the push for sovereign surveillance capabilities could inadvertently fuel an arms race, as nations feel compelled to build their own tracking systems rather than rely on shared data, potentially increasing mistrust.

The New Space Domain Awareness

Wark introduces the concept of "space domain awareness" (SDA) not as a bureaucratic term, but as a survival mechanism. He explains that SDA goes beyond simple tracking; it is the work of "figuring out what's out there, what it's for, and whether it poses a threat." The threats are no longer just accidental debris; they include deliberate attacks. The author cites a 2011 Pentagon warning that "Space is becoming increasingly congested, contested and competitive," a sentiment that has only intensified fifteen years later.

The coverage details how the private sector, led by entrepreneur Brendan Quine, is filling the gap left by traditional government systems. Quine's system, Earthfence, uses a network of refurbished dishes in places like Madagascar and Portugal to monitor geostationary orbit. Wark describes these satellites as the "Lamborghinis of the space world," emphasizing their high value and vulnerability. The author argues that this dual-use technology is essential because "warnings are often too frequent or too imprecise to be actionable, leading to alert fatigue," a problem that commercial systems aim to solve with greater precision.

Yet, the military rationale remains the driving force. Wark quotes Brigadier-General Christopher Horner, who traces the urgency to the fact that "nearly 20 percent of the Canadian economy functions on space-enabled architecture." The military is moving from relying on US data to building "sovereign national capability," with projects like the Redwing microsatellite designed to monitor polar regions where optical sensors struggle. This shift reflects a broader geopolitical reality: "The US is also no longer the only actor shaping what can be seen," as Russia and China develop their own catalogs.

The Shadow of Conflict

The piece does not shy away from the darker implications of this surveillance buildup. Wark writes, "The darkest reality is: for war fighting." He details the emergence of "counterspace" tactics, including GPS jamming, cyberattacks, and even the testing of nuclear-armed satellites by Russia. The author describes a future where "bodyguard" satellites shadow critical assets, ready to engage in sabotage or repair, turning the orbital environment into a potential battlefield.

While the focus is on Canadian sovereignty, the human cost of a space war is a terrifying abstraction. If the orbital infrastructure collapses, the cascading effects on global communications, navigation, and financial systems would be catastrophic. Wark notes that the US Space Force estimates China and Russia are actively attempting to "disrupt and degrade" American capabilities. The author suggests that without a shared code of conduct, the risk of "accidents, misperceptions, or escalation" is dangerously high.

You can't share stories from thewalrus.ca on Facebook or Instagram because of Meta's response to the Online News Act, but you can share this Substack article there

(Note: The source text includes this meta-commentary which is irrelevant to the analysis of space surveillance and has been excluded from the narrative flow to maintain focus on the core argument.)

The coverage effectively highlights the tension between commercial innovation and military necessity. While private companies like ThothX offer cost-effective solutions, Wark points out that the military cannot rely on them entirely for "purely spy missions." The "5 percent" of surveillance that is most sensitive remains the domain of those in uniform, ensuring that sovereignty is not outsourced.

Bottom Line

Wark's strongest argument is the reframing of space surveillance as an economic imperative rather than just a military luxury; the cost of inaction is measured in billions of dollars daily. The piece's greatest vulnerability lies in its reliance on the assumption that increased visibility will prevent conflict, rather than acknowledging that better surveillance might simply enable more precise targeting. Readers should watch for how the proposed "Son of Sapphire" and Redwing projects evolve, as they represent the tangible shift from passive observation to active, sovereign defense in a contested domain.

Sources

Canada is building a surveillance network in space

by The Walrus · · Read full article

Don Johnston / Alamy

This story was originally published on thewalrus.ca

By Wesley Wark

Deep in the forests of Algonquin Provincial Park, a few hours north of Toronto, sits a metal monster. Like the iron giant of British poet Ted Hughes’s fable, it, too, has come back to life, reassembled. Hughes’s creation saves the planet. What’s this one’s mission?

Our iron giant is a deep space radio telescope, with an antenna dish measuring forty-six metres across, the largest instrument of its kind in Canada. Starting in the 1960s, the Algonquin Radio Observatory performed a number of cutting-edge scientific projects, including joining the search for extraterrestrial intelligence’s early efforts, in the 1970s and 1980s, to find signatures of alien life—spectrum emissions from water molecules, artificial transmitter signals. No luck.

Then the ARO fell on hard times—budget cutbacks, advances in telescope technology, aged and failing equipment. Canada’s iron giant was mothballed by its operator, the National Research Council, in 1987. There it sat, silent, rusting, for two decades.

The radio telescope was leased to a scientist and entrepreneur, Brendan Quine, in 2007. Quine had come to Canada after his PhD at Oxford and helped establish a space engineering program at Toronto’s York University. To pursue more experimental and commercially ambitious projects, he co-founded Thoth Technology in 2001 and later spun off an affiliate, ThothX.

Thoth, Quine reminded me, was an Egyptian deity of wisdom. X? Elon Musk, of course. Musk has built his rocket enterprise, SpaceX, and his social media company, ex-Twitter, now X, into world-leading enterprises. Quine has similar ambitions—what he half-jokingly calls his “world domination plan.”

But first he had to resurrect the iron giant. He fixed the broken windows of the control station, installed new electronics, and secured the perimeter against bears. Then he had to give the instrument a new purpose. What Quine ultimately hit on speaks to our threatened times, severe geopolitical tensions, and our accelerating dependence on space platforms for critical services, including telecommunications and navigation.

Using ARO, ThothX can detect one-metre-long objects in orbit at a distance of 100,000 kilometres—about a quarter of the way to the moon. And it can do it in any weather, day or night, at a fraction of the cost of traditional systems. In military nomenclature, the objective is “space domain awareness.” SDA goes beyond tracking satellites; it’s the work of figuring out what’s out there, what it’s for, and ...