← Back to Library

What happens if you keep slowing down?

A photograph captured in 1936 shows a hummingbird frozen mid-flight, its wings a blur of motion suspended in perfect stillness. The image is impossibly sharp—no smear, no blur, just pure frozen time. This wasn't the work of some modern sensor or digital sensor. It came from a machine that predates the smartphone era by decades.

The man behind this visual revolution was Harold Edgerton—an MIT engineer who developed what we now call strobe photography. His technique didn't just capture motion; it stopped it entirely, producing images so precise they still rival today's technology.

What happens if you keep slowing down?

By the 1920s, electric motors powered factories across America. But these machines had a problem: they were sensitive to power fluctuations from lightning strikes or grid instability. Engineers could rarely see what went wrong inside them because the motors spun too fast for the human eye.

Edgerton noticed something odd about his equipment—that whenever it triggered a power surge, the moving parts appeared frozen in time. This observation led him to a breakthrough: he could capture sharp photographs by illuminating subjects with extremely brief flashes of light.

The key was creating reliable flashes lasting just 10 microseconds. He built a device using a high voltage power source that loaded electrons onto a capacitor. These electrons would surge through a glass tube filled with argon or xenon gas, heating to around 10,000 Kelvin—nearly twice as hot as the sun's surface—instantly producing light before recombining with the gas atoms and going dark.

By the early 1930s, Edgerton took his strobe outside the lab. He traveled with his wife, approaching factories and demonstrating his technique to skeptical workers. The results spoke for themselves: impossibly sharp images of gears in motion that seemed frozen in time.

But Edgerton's real innovation came when he moved beyond machines. He started photographing tennis balls pancaked against rackets, hummingbirds hovering mid-flight, balloons popping—moments the human eye could never perceive. His work appeared in Life magazine and National Geographic, essentially the social media influencers of their era. He had an intuitive sense for composition that made these invisible moments visible.

Timing these shots required solving what seemed impossible: how do you trigger a strobe exactly when a tennis ball hits a racket? The answer was sound itself—a microphone would detect the pop or crack and trigger the flash after precisely calculated delays.

In 1939, an unexpected visitor arrived at Edgerton's lab. US Army major George Goddard worked in military photography and needed a way to capture reconnaissance images at night without endangering pilots. The existing method—flying over targets and dropping flares on parachutes—was dangerously exposed.

Edgerton calculated he could create a flash powerful enough to illuminate the ground from a plane flying a mile up. The device released around 60,000 joules in a single millisecond with peak power roughly equivalent to a large solar farm. This technology was quickly deployed during World War II, allowing the Allies to photograph Normandy before D-Day and confirm German troops were unprepared.

The strobe photos remained remarkably sharp—especially Edgerton's original 1930s work—and demonstrated that sometimes older techniques matched or exceeded modern alternatives.

Modern research-grade cameras from 2020 capture 20,000 frames per second but struggle to match Edgerton's resolution. The reason is a fundamental trade-off in imaging technology: spatial resolution (pixel count) and temporal resolution (frame rate) cannot be maximized simultaneously. Current hardware limits how fast pixels can be read from sensors.

To push beyond this constraint requires sacrificing either pixel count or frame rate. One camera system achieves one trillion frames per second—but only sees a single pixel at a time.

These single-pixel cameras capture how many photons land on a sensor sensitive enough to register when even a single photon hits it, timing arrivals with roughly one picosecond precision. Light travels only 0.3 millimeters during that span.

This technology exists in smartphones as lidar sensors measuring distances by bouncing light pulses off objects and calculating return times. The result enables ultra-slow-motion video showing actual light propagation through space—revealing wavefronts moving through a bottle, how light bounces off caps, the precise moment of impact when objects meet.

Deep Dives

Explore these related deep dives:

Sources

What happens if you keep slowing down?

by Derek Muller · Veritasium · Watch video

This is a video of light traveling through a bottle at 250 billion frames per second. And here's that same video, but now with the camera moving. You can see it sweeps across the scene faster than the laser pulse itself. Which means this camera must be traveling faster than light.

So, how is this possible? Well, in this video, I want to show you three unusual ways of stopping time and what you can see if you just keep slowing down. From a century old technique that still beats modern slow-mo cameras all the way to a massive quadrillion frames per second camera that captures electrons whizzing around molecules. By the 1920s, electric motors were the new standard for powering factories and mills.

But many of these motors also came with a flaw. They were sensitive to fluctuations in the electrical grid. A power surge, like from a lightning strike, made them behave unpredictably. So, one MIT engineer named Harold Doc Edertton set out to find a solution.

He had a setup that could induce these power surges in a lab. But no matter what he tried, Edertton just couldn't see what was going on with the motors because the machines would spin too fast for the human eye to see. And cameras at the time offered no help. Their exposure times were too slow.

So any photograph of a running motor would come out blurry. But one day, Edertton noticed that every time he triggered a power surge, his equipment gave off a bright flash of light. And when that flash hit the motor, the moving parts appeared to stand perfectly still, as if frozen in time, which gave him an idea. He could turn off all the lights in the room, set up a camera, and leave the shutter open.

And since there was no light, no image would form on the film. But then if he could illuminate the motor with a very brief and very bright flash like the ones his equipment gave off, well then he would get a sharp photograph. All Editton needed was a way to reliably create these flashes. So he started by using a high voltage power source to load electrons onto a capacitor where they piled up onto one of the plates.

But because there was an insulator slotted between the two sides, the electrons couldn't just jump to ...